Welcome

 

A Message to Our Readers
Featured Domain

 

The very real benefits of understanding the human aspects of business process management (BPM)
Insights

 

Acquisition Management

Program Management

Human Capital Management
Research Update
Events
Links
Contact Us
Free trial           Subscribe Now
Recognizing the Human Side of Business Processes Management

— By Garrison Solutions Executive Consultant Cary Paul, Founder and President Rick Kiehle, and Advisor John Hanasack

The President’s Management Agenda (PMA) — the need to get to green and stay there—has become part of everyday life for federal managers and leaders. At this point, nearly all government executives recognize that they can only achieve the goals of the PMA by successfully implementing effective business process management (BPM) techniques.

Effective BPM can lead to the realization of many of the key goals of the PMA, including:

  • Flatter organizations
  • Citizen-focused results
  • Harmonious balance of functions
  • Restructured layers of government with
    • A reduction in management layers
    • An increase in front-line staff

Although public- and private-sector executives have analyzed and refined the business management process for decades, the most essential component of process—people—is often overlooked, if not forgotten. However, experience suggests that the most successful BPM implementations not only include, but actually focus on, the human side of business process.

A Simple Concept That’s Often Overlooked

What is the human side of business process? The concept itself is really quite simple. Most BPM programs examine only exactly what the title implies: business processes. Often, in the course of analyzing and reworking processes to drive the greatest outcome at the lowest cost, managers forget that there are human aspects to many processes—particularly processes in a service environment, like that of the federal government. To truly improve the efficiency of business processes, it is essential to drive process development from the individual employee level. This requires:

  • Focusing on decision-making at the individual level
  • Recognizing that individual employees can impact change by adopting more efficient processes
  • Establishing accountability at the individual employee and team levels.
While there are many important factors in integrating the human side into BPM, in our experience there are four essential aspects:
  • Mapping processes, activities, learning, communications, and resources
  • Communicating expectations and plans at the individual level
  • Managing performance, accessing relevant information, tracking progress
  • Evolving and changing the BPM based upon performance and the dynamics of the organization.
Best Practices in Integrating the Human Factor into BPM

Select and Train Senior Managers With Care

One key to integrating the human factor into BPM is to recognize that people understand, and interact with, BPM in a wide variety of ways. Senior managers responsible for overseeing BPM must be capable of embracing BPM entirely and must understand its interaction with and impact on strategy. Ideally, leaders responsible for BPM possess “implementer” skill sets so that they can interact with their staffs, colleagues, and others to efficiently and effectively operate a BPM program.

Establish Level-Appropriate Training and Guidance

Another crucial factor to integrating the human side into BPM is appropriate staff involvement. All staff within a business unit may be affected by BPM, but different staff members will be affected in different ways depending upon their understanding of, and involvement in, the program. Generally, staff may be divided into three broad groups: those who are involved (1) minimally, (2) somewhat, or (3) highly. Personnel who are minimally involved with BPM require fairly little exposure to it, although it cannot be stressed enough that they do require at least an introduction to the concept. This level of involvement may require presentations, seminars, and fundamental training. Those employees who are somewhat involved in the BPM process will need, on top of the basic understanding, to learn methods, technologies and outcomes of BPM. Finally, staff who will be highly involved with BPM must learn knowledge transfer, staff training, creative solution development, and the overall cultural implications of BPM.

For all levels of involvement, it is essential to remember that people learn differently, and therefore various training tools need to be developed to address, for example, the visual learner, the tactile learner, and the written learner.

Drive Metrics and Accountability to the Individual and Team Levels

One of the key tenets of integrating the human side into BPM is to connect individuals and teams to business process outcomes. Process goals that do not drive to individual performance by their very nature disconnect the individual from the outcome. It is essential, then, that every individual involved in BPM understand the metrics that are specific to their work, as well as the particular areas for which they are accountable.

Employ Technology to Gain the Greatest Benefit

The use of technology, such as the deployment of BPM on an intranet, is essential to gaining the greatest benefit from the integration of the human side into BPM. Technologies make process solutions scalable and global. They enable organizations to link various systems, reducing information input, rework, and information sharing time, as well as dramatically improving quality by eliminating the necessity to consolidate data from various systems. Furthermore, the use of technology helps to drive accountability by placing resources right at the fingertips of all users.

Case Study: Reducing Time and Expense in Monthly Financial Reporting

The Issue

One organization that achieved success by integrating the human side into BPM is a large public company based in the Midwest. The company has 8 locations and 28 separate charts of accounts. Each location had several staff members dedicated to closing the books each month, and a location-specific “close coordinator.” There also was a master close coordinator at headquarters. In all, over 2,500 hours were spent monthly to close the books.

Each office maintained a separate spreadsheet file of its financials and each followed its own processes and procedures for closing the books each month. On a monthly basis, the close coordinator consolidated all of the offices’ files. Every month, closing the books took an average of 18 days. On top of that, the books often had to be reopened the following month to address changes, omissions, and updates.

The Process

The company recognized the benefits of decreasing the time and effort involved in closing the books, as well as the opportunity to improve quality. The first step in improving the process was to identify all of the staff who needed to be involved in discovering the solution. The change project focused on the people rather than the process to ensure that each employee would have a stake in the solution. Representatives from each location then got together to develop a common process at the task level. The common process drove metrics and established accountability at the individual level.

Once tasks and processes, metrics and accountabilities were nailed down, the organization implemented an on-line template that all of the locations would use to update their financials. The on-line system improved timeliness by auto-populating some standard information, and eliminated the need to share and consolidate files. It also dramatically improved consistency and quality because all work instructions are available at the proper level across the organization. In addition, the reduced timeframe provided greater opportunity for work review, reducing unnecessary errors.

The Results

The result of the implementation of these changes has been a reduction in turnaround time to 5 days and approximately 1,000 hours from the initial average of 18 days and 2,500 hours. Furthermore, eight full time equivalencies (FTEs) within the organization, who used to devote 100% of their time to monthly closing activities, now spend time on other value-added activities. In all, an estimated $225,000 is saved monthly, and the books are not re-opened.

While the benefits of a strong BPM program are widely recognized, the additional benefits of integrating the human factor in the business processes are still largely untapped. By taking this vital step in the business management process, organizations can realize labor and dollar savings as well as quality improvements.

Additional Information
For more information on how to integrate the human side into BPM, contact Cary Paul at Garrison Solutions (cpaul@garrisonsolutions.com) or visit Pivotal Insight online at www.pivotal-insight.com.

Free trial           Subscribe Now

 

©2006 Pivotal Insight, LLC. All rights reserved.